|
Post by Forbidden on Jul 14, 2003 21:43:49 GMT -5
Oh shut up Blake, you're not in charge of this forum so you have no right to tell anyone what to do. Just when things got better you start off with your stupid post just so someone would get angry about it. Who cares if you cares, my opinion has totally changed about you, and this wasn't even necessary. Heh, really, it's funny. My posting has already stopped two pages ago, ending the small argument between me and Tritail, and you come outta nowhere and just tell people what to do. If you want to continue this and make this a flame war, go on and post. But if you want this to stop before it gets any worse, YOU shut up about me, I'm not gonna let you talk about me like BMZ does.
If you're mature enough, don't reply to this post, or I guarantee this well become really bad.
|
|
|
Post by Tritail on Jul 14, 2003 22:45:20 GMT -5
Just because it isn't his juristiction doesn't mean the offense hadn't been made, Zeephos. I applaud blake for making the effort to see what was right is made so. And your "act" of being mature isn't working, because I see through it. You mentioned before that you were being mature and that I should calm down, but as you may read in earlier posts that I did not call anyone a name-you however, resulted to using a word that did not even correctly format what I truly should have been labeled. Get a dictionary and look up the word mature, and then come back and flame me, because I just responded to your post.
|
|
|
Post by ObviousDelirium on Jul 14, 2003 22:50:46 GMT -5
This topic should get locked...
It's turning worse...
|
|
|
Post by theblakeman on Jul 14, 2003 23:01:18 GMT -5
Zeeph: I have access to the Admin Forum, therefore I can warn you. ;D Not that I will...
|
|
|
Post by Forbidden on Jul 14, 2003 23:08:22 GMT -5
EDIT: Oopsie, me and Blake posted at the same time. Hehe, warn me about what? About arguing? That's not in the rules, buddy. (The "buddy" part was a joke.)
Now onto the post:
What the? You are pathetic. Even when it's finished you continue it AGAIN. Was there really a reason for that post of yours? No, there wasn't. I told you to calm down so we can get to the point we got, where it's over, so it was over. Then, Blake came, you applaud and stuff and then you once again continue it. Why? What is the point? I asked you to calm down, and you did. That's good, why oh why must you continue it? It's funny how pathetic people can be. I don't care if I repeat myself over and over again, but it's just really hilarious. Now, I'm gonna do this very slowly.
First post of mine: Tritail, you idiot, you judge games by their graphics. You know nothing about RPG's. So, if I make a game with stunning graphics and the plot is "Rockie kidnapped the princess, we must save her!" you'd give it a 4? sleeper.
<Commenting on that you judge games by graphics. The end word, "sleeper", was actually a joke, as you said it yourself.>
You: Oh dear God why do you people critisize me for MY review system. Jesus. It is MINE, so all I have to say if you don't like it, make your own.... A game can have a good story, and maybe it just so happens I LIKE Power Trip's story? It doesn't have to be smashingly original to get the f**king job done! If I really believe that that world exists, then Veter had done his job. His introduction was very good to set the mood and that game has THE most original crap I've seen in such a long time. Original (semi) CMS, Original CBS, original sprites, the list goes on. If you don't like it, it doesn't matter to me-Grow up and stop flaming me. I agree that story has a lot to do with it, but you people act like Busterman had a great story, as Veter had one so nutsty that it's laughable. Such is not the case. P.S. I wouldn't give your game a 4 because of how much you just told me, because it sounds like a 1. What the hell is your people's problem with jumping to conclusions?
<You, arguing back, making your point.>
My second post: Tritail - It looks like you don't have much of an experience with forums, what I posted was not a flame.
You're a bad reviewer, and I'm not saying that because BMZ is my friend, I'm saying because you are a bad reviewer. You give rank to games for their graphics, not their story. We don't like the way you review, so we don't want to see your reviews. Simple. You need to grow up, and don't get mad so quick, that's not smart. If you want to explain the way you review, calm down and do it.
Now, Power Trip was not a good game. The gameplay was bad, they used Squaresoft music, and of course, the plot, was terrible. I didn't think much of the CBS either. I do understand we all have different opinions, but giving that game a 4? What a shame.
The thing that does impress me, is that even though I called you a fool and a "sleeper" you didn't really curse or anything, so that's a good point for you, but still, calm down.
<Still arguing, saying you are a bad reviewer, and in the end, telling you that I'm impressed that you were mature enough not to flame or curse, and that you shouldn't be calming down.>
Your next post: This is how I judge my games: Presentation: (This includes but is not limited to.... Professionalism: Dialogue is believable. Towns are not just two houses, an inn and the mayor's house. Basically, does this world exist? This includes graphics and story.) Effects: (Basically the overall graphics grade of the game. Did they rock or suck?) Design: (Is the custom systems easy to understand? Do they have depth? if they are complex, is there a satisfactory explanation? If there are no custom systems... is the map design good? Is there not just bare rooms with walls and a bed?) Entertainment: (How fun is this game? A sleeper or a real button mashing glee fest? Does the fun last?) Originality: (We all know that it is VERY difficult to be original these days... but I find that someone that puts hard work into the "little" quirks are most often seen are more original than a FLASH-BANG stand-alone story. Character personalities and the such, must be original to some extent. This includes graphics and story.)
The story does not have to be necessarily the trump card of the game. It depends on how it is presented and how original it is. Good dialogue is a part of presentation. I agree that story and plot are essential to a game, but it all comes down to how you show it on the screen....
My 3rd post: Right. I have played LSZ, but I'll download it again, I'll comment on it later.
<Finally understood your ways, and that's it, it was over.>
<You talk to Nuno about reviewing his game and such and such>
Blakeman's post: And Zeephos, speak for your own d**n self when saying "We don't like your reviews", because I sure as hell never said that. Thank you and shut the hell up.
<Huh? Where did that come from? Why now, it's already over. I did understand the way you review.>
<Then, you once again continue the argument for no reason. Like I said a billion times, I did understand the way you review, there was absolutely no need for any comment. It was OVER.>
And why? What do you want to prove? Now we're arguing about the previous argue. Isn't that stupid? Yes, it is. Now I suggest both of us shut up, because there's really no need for ANYTHING right now.
I don't think this thread should be closed, if I get lucky we can get on-topic again.
|
|
|
Post by Magi on Jul 15, 2003 0:21:10 GMT -5
You people are all stupid. Let the man say what he wants okay? If Tri-Tail gave Power trip a 4/5 and gave LSZ a 2/5 that's his own bloody problem d**n it. People have no right to tell the critics they're wrong since this is MERELY their humble or not so humble opinion.
The simple minded are wooed by flashy effects and pretty colors. I liked Power Trip's graphics and code, I admire that, but some of the mapping is quite horrible and the storyline isn't the greatest thing ever. See? This is called an opinion people! Yes it's kinda like Hellfusion's opinion on us and Legion Saga!
Busterman, if you didn't care about what Hellfusion had to say about Legion Saga in general, what's going to make you get offended by TriTail? LSZ wasn't the worst rm2k game I've played, but at the very least I would of given it a 3 out of 5.
It appears that everyones only "smart and logical response was to flame everybody in sight!" When that failed, let's argue with him! I'm sure that will make things MUCH MUCH better. Especially since his feeble opinions will ruin my game! This is a critics job people, many get paid to be this way. Criticism is a harsh mistress as they would say and in the real world, it's full of it.
As for you Zeephos calm down. d**n, you'd think you were an extremist the way you were talking a while back. It's obvious everyone has said what needed to be said and flamed to their hearts content, I think we've all gotten a bit out of hand. No one can take back what TriTail said himself, and therefore there is no reason to argue any further.
|
|
|
Post by Chickensoupcheese on Jul 15, 2003 0:27:23 GMT -5
This is a complete mess. Doesn't seem a lot of feedback on Zenith itself.
Topic Locked.
|
|