|
Post by Sanovarak on Mar 22, 2003 8:13:45 GMT -5
Do you think Iraq will hit back?
|
|
|
Post by PaulC on Mar 22, 2003 9:50:47 GMT -5
With what? They have no 'weapons of mass destruction' capable of damaging the US or an ally, or we never would have risked taking them on (see: North Korea) and their army is currently rather occupied with the invasion.
|
|
|
Post by The Jacket on Mar 22, 2003 10:49:00 GMT -5
ThyInquisitor: Ok, look. I withdraw and apologize for the statement that you are a self-centered jerk. I guess I was really mad about what you posted and didn't think before I wrote it. However, I do find your stance sickening. Wum: Dude. I seriously hope you didn't mean we were actually [Yankee Accent] "Thaking ower feelingth out on himmmm." [/Yankee Accent] I find his point of view rather sickening and I'm not holding back from saying so. If I wanted to take my felines ( ) out on somebody over this, it certainly wouldn't be on the internet. I have a sister I can yell at. As well as some people at school. If you're going to post a point of view, you'd better do it realizing that some may not like it and can and/or WILL pummel it. Agh....I was going to get involved, but this'll more than likely be my last post in this thread. I don't want to argue about something and then get to a point where I don't know anymore and just look stupid.
|
|
|
Post by Sanovarak on Mar 22, 2003 11:37:05 GMT -5
Paul: Iraq has nuclear weapons.
This should be in Debates.
|
|
|
Post by PaulC on Mar 22, 2003 11:52:47 GMT -5
Paul: Iraq has nuclear weapons. Eh? Iraq does absolutely NOT have any nuclear capability whatsoever; they may have been trying to attain this capability but there is no suggestion by anyone, not the inspectors, not the US, not the UK, not the UN, that they actually possess them at this point or that they ever have. I don't think you really know enough about the situation to be taking part in a debate about it.
|
|
|
Post by The~Inquisitor on Mar 22, 2003 12:00:54 GMT -5
Couldn't have put it better myself, Paul. Like it was said earlier, if Iraq really DID have weapons of MASS destruction, America and England wouldn't be so confident about going to war. They are definatly after the oil suplies seems most of the worlds oil comes from Iraq. The whole thing about weapons of mass destruction is their way of making the war seem like a just-war. As people are now seeing through this many people are against the war.
|
|
Fredbez
RPG Townie
Satanist 0wnage
Posts: 694
|
Post by Fredbez on Mar 22, 2003 12:44:11 GMT -5
yup we all want the oil except they'll burn them to spite us
|
|
|
Post by Sanovarak on Mar 22, 2003 13:03:05 GMT -5
DO you Paul really think Iraq has no Nuclear weapons!? It's because you're American. Well, they have poisons, killing like. And, America can't do any mass destructions, because of "Human-Shields". And Iraq, they have oil.
Of course, you are little bit right: Iraq hasn't A Class Soldiers. They don't enough money for Elite Soldiers.
And I REALLY know this situation. It's been news in my homeplace. I am just "Few-word-man". That's why I don't sometime do any debates. Debates need a some long-talk man, like SleepyTemplar.
Just talk about Iraq, OK!?
|
|
|
Post by PaulC on Mar 22, 2003 13:26:42 GMT -5
DO you Paul really think Iraq has no Nuclear weapons!? It's because you're American. Er... yes, I really do think that. There is no reason or evidence to support the belief that they do; they would have used them by this point. I'm a bit puzzled by your claim that the fact that I'm American would change my interpretation of what is a generally accepted fact. Well, they have poisons, killing like. And, America can't do any mass destructions, because of "Human-Shields". And Iraq, they have oil. It's entirely possible they still have biological/chemical weapons, yeah. But nuclear weapons, no way. I don't believe they were a threat to anybody but themselves.
|
|
|
Post by Sanovarak on Mar 22, 2003 13:31:36 GMT -5
They HAVE threatened you peoples with chemical weapons.
How do you think they don't have nuclear weapons? I don't think they didn't even destroyed all their weapons.
ALSO: Iraq has reported they have some destuction weapons.
|
|
|
Post by PaulC on Mar 22, 2003 13:36:39 GMT -5
They never had nuclear weapons to destroy in the first place. If they had them, they would have used them by now. Iraq is toothless; the extent of their illegal weaponry as we have seen in the war is a few missiles that can fly 120 km instead of the allowed 90, and perhaps a few chemical weapons. Wow, huge threat to the United States and their arsenal of nuclear weapons that could destroy all life on this planet with ease.
|
|
|
Post by Phantom Janus on Mar 22, 2003 13:38:05 GMT -5
Iraq has no long-range missles that are a threat to America. If they had any normal missles and used them on the American/British Army, that would turn a lot of countries against Iraq, cause a big conflict...blah...
|
|
|
Post by Sanovarak on Mar 22, 2003 13:41:18 GMT -5
Oh God. I give up. Think what you think.
|
|
|
Post by TheNeanderthal on Mar 22, 2003 13:50:39 GMT -5
Dude, calm down.
|
|
|
Post by Sanovarak on Mar 22, 2003 13:56:20 GMT -5
No, I got tired of this arguing. I am not angry, Dan.
|
|